Journal of Tissue Viability
Volume 17, Issue 1 , Pages 22-29 , February 2008

How does bed frame design influence tissue interface pressure? A comparison of four different technologies designed for long-term or home care

  • Evan Call

      Affiliations

    • Department of Microbiology, Adjunct Faculty, College of Science, Weber State University, 2506 University Circle, Ogden, UT 84408, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 801 626 6949.
  • ,
  • Loyal Baker

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Weber State University, 1702 University Circle, Ogden, UT 84408, USA

References 

  1. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) . Updated staging system. Available from: http://www.npuap.org/pr2.htm[accessed 04.04.07]
  2. Lahmann NA, Halfens RJ, Dassen T. Pressure ulcers in German nursing homes and acute care hospitals: frequency and ulcer characteristics. Ostomy Wound Management. 2006;52(2):20–33
  3. Groeneveld A, Anderson M, Allen S, et al. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in a tertiary care pediatric and adult hospital. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 2004;31(3):108–120
  4. McLeod AG. Principles of alternating pressure surfaces. Advances in Wound Care. 1997;10(7):30–36
  5. Defloor T. The effect of position and mattress on interface pressure. Applied Nursing Research. 2000;13(1):2–11
  6. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) . Terms and definitions related to support surface standards initiative. Ver. 01/29/07. Available from: http://www.npuap.org/NPUAP_S3I_TD.pdf[accessed 05.09.07]
  7. Harada C, Shigematsu T, Hagisawa S. The effect of 10-degree leg elevation and 30-degree head elevation on body displacement and sacral interface pressures over a 2-hour period. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 2002;29(3):143–148
  8. Jeneid P. Static and dynamic support systems – pressure differences on the body. In:  Kenedi RM,  Cowden JM,  Scales JT editor. Bedsore biomechanics. London: McMillan; 1976;p. 287–299
  9. Whittemore R, Bautista C, Smith C, Bruttomesso K. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler's position. Journal of Enterostomal Therapy Nursing. 1993;20:111–115
  10. Perla J, Edsberg L, Call E. Shear force initiative. A report on the work of the international consensus group [oral presentation]. Symposium on advanced wound care. Tampa, Florida; 2007.
  11. Brienza DM, Geyer MJ. Understanding support surface technologies. Advances in Skin and Wound Care. 2000;13(5):237–244
  12. Rithalia S. Assessment of patient support surfaces: principle, practice and limitations. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology. 2005;29(4):163–169
  13. Corcoran PJ. Use it or lose it – the hazards of bed rest and inactivity. The Western Journal of Medicine. 1991;154(5):536–538
  14. Norton L, Sibbald G. Is bed rest an effective treatment modality for pressure ulcers?. Ostomy Wound Management. 2004;50(10):40–52
  15. Drakulovic M, Torres A, Bauer T, et al. Supine body position as a risk factor for nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. Lancet. 1999;354:1851–1858
  16. Shorr AF, Kollef MH. Ventilator associated pneumonia: insights from recent clinical trials. Chest. 2005;128:583s–591s
  17. Clark M. Repositioning to prevent pressure sores – what is the evidence?. Nursing Standard. 1998;13(3):58–64
  18. Krishnagopalan S, Johnson W, Low L, et al. Body positioning of intensive care patients: clinical practice versus standards. Critical Care Medicine. 2002;31(11):2588–2592
  19. Keogh A, Dealey C. Profiling beds versus standard hospital beds: effects on pressure ulcer incidence outcomes. Journal of Wound Care. 2001;10(2):15–19
  20. Bliss MR. Pressure injuries: causes and prevention. Hospital Medicine. 1998;59(11):841–844
  21. Bader D, Oomens C. Recent advances in pressure ulcer research. In:  Romanelli M editors. Science and practice of pressure ulcer management. London: Springer; 2006;p. 11–26
  22. Mitchell J, Jones J, McNair B, McClenahan J. Better beds for health care: report of the Kings Fund Centenary Bed Project. London: Kings Fund; 1998;
  23. Gray D, Whelan S, Russell G, Balura N. Evaluation of an electric bed frame and pressure reducing mattress. British Journal of Community Nursing. 2000;5(12):596–602
  24. Gray D, Cooper PJ, Stringfellow S. Evaluating pressure reducing foam mattresses and electric bed frames. British Journal of Nursing. 2001;10(22):S23–S31
  25. Purvis K, Pearman A. How the use of electric profiling beds can reduce the prevalence of pressure ulcers. Professional Nurse. 2005;20(8):46–48

 This study was funded by an investigational grant from Huntleigh Healthcare LLC.

PII: S0268-0009(07)00005-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2007.09.007

Journal of Tissue Viability
Volume 17, Issue 1 , Pages 22-29 , February 2008