Journal of Tissue Viability
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 7-12, February 2009

The prevalence, management and outcome for acute wounds identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district

  • Kathryn R. Vowden

      Affiliations

    • Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & University of Bradford, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Kathryn R. Vowden, Nurse Consultant, Wound Healing Unit, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK. Tel.: +44 1274 364466; fax: +44 1274 364807.
  • ,
  • Peter Vowden

      Affiliations

    • Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Visiting Professor of Wound Healing Research University of Bradford, UK

Abstract 

This paper reports the characteristics and local management of 826 acute wounds identified during an audit across all health care providers serving the population of Bradford, UK. Of the wounds encountered 303 were traumatic wounds and 237 primary closures with smaller numbers of other acute wound types. Of the 303 traumatic wounds 174 occurred in women (57.4%). Men predominated in the under 45s (65M:26F), this being largely accounted for by hand and finger trauma (n=62) particularly in patients of working age (M32:F12). Women predominated in the over 65s (50M:130F), this being largely accounted for by lower limb traumatic wounds (M24:F91), the majority of these being in patients 65 and over (M14:F82). In this sub-group of 96 patients 25 had wounds of 6 weeks or longer duration, only 3 had undergone Doppler assessment and only 2 received compression bandaging. Typically these wounds were of recent origin and small in size (under 1 week and less than 5cm2 in surface area) however exceptions occurred where 10 people had wounds over 25cm2 in area while 3 wounds had been present for over 5 years. 101 (12.2%) of the encountered wounds were considered to be infected although the practice of wound swabbing in the presence of presumed infection seemed inadequate with 37.6% of all infected acute wounds not being swabbed while 97 non-infected wounds were swabbed. Where wounds were swabbed 4.5% were found to be MRSA positive. Across all acute wound types (with the sole exception of primary closures) antimicrobial wound dressings were the most prevalent form of dressing and covered 56 (55.4%) of all infected wounds.

Keywords: Acute wounds, Prevalence, Care provision, Treatment, Infection

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0965-206X(08)00049-1

doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2008.11.004

Journal of Tissue Viability
Volume 18, Issue 1 , Pages 7-12, February 2009