Journal of Tissue Viability
Volume 18, Issue 3 , Pages 80-87, August 2009

Do maggots have an influence on bacterial growth? A study on the susceptibility of strains of six different bacterial species to maggots of Lucilia sericata and their excretions/secretions

  • G. Cazander

      Affiliations

    • Department of Trauma Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Both authors contributed equally.
  • ,
  • K.E.B. van Veen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Trauma Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Both authors contributed equally.
  • ,
  • A.T. Bernards

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • G.N. Jukema

      Affiliations

    • Department of Trauma Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +31 20 444 4444; fax: +31 20 444 4559.

published online 10 April 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

The maggots of Lucilia sericata are successfully used as a treatment for infected wounds. Many articles are published about possible direct antibacterial properties of maggots and their excretions/secretions (ES), but with different results. The present study reinvestigates the susceptibility of six bacterial strains to maggots and their ES.

Methods

Live maggots were added to a bacterial suspension. After incubation for 16h, the bacterial growth in this suspension was compared with the growth in a suspension without maggots. We tested Instar-1 and Instar-3 maggots and compared nutrient broths. A turbidimetric assay investigated the antibacterial activity of ES. Finally, we compared the bacterial growth of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Results

The test with live maggots showed an increase of bacterial growth. Instar-1 maggots stimulated more bacterial growth than Instar-3 maggots, as well as the use of a more nutritious broth. The turbidimetric assay showed no inhibition of bacterial growth. For all bacteria, except Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an increase in bacterial growth was shown.

Conclusion

There is no direct antibacterial effect of maggots and/or ES in vitro, however in clinical observations maggot therapy is successful. More research is needed to focus on possible indirect antibacterial activity, such as an immune-related effect.

Keywords: Lucilia sericata, Maggot, Disinfection, Antibacterial activity, Bacterial growth, Excretions/secretions

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0965-206X(09)00019-9

doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2009.02.005

Journal of Tissue Viability
Volume 18, Issue 3 , Pages 80-87, August 2009